indigokvm.blogg.se

Still, even that “Sheep” has “a threat’ning horn,” which indicates that even in this submissive and gentle creature, something exists that could do physical harm to another. These notions are noted as “humble,” which pairs well with the understood qualities of a “Sheep.” Essentially, it will do as it is guided to do with little contention. Once more, the “Sheep” is capitalized to indicate the word represents everything a “Sheep” is known for, like bashfulness, skittishness, and a tendency to follow others.

There is no perfection to be found in them, as a “thorn” is noted as present. Rather, it is a flaw the “Rose” itself causes by “put forth.”Īs a representation of what is “beaut” and elegant in the world then, the “Rose” reveals that there is harshness found within those otherwise wonderful concepts.

This is not a fault the “Rose” naturally has or must suffer through in this context. In spite of its “beaut” and “modest” characteristics, however, Blake notes the “Rose puts forth a thorn.” This represents its fault, and Blake’s decision to use “puts” as the verb is telling. The ideas are stretched, which is highlighted in the personification that simply cannot be literal. This is connected to the earlier mentioned idea of the “Rose” embodying everything for which a “Rose” is noted. Of course, a “Rose” is not capable of being “modest” or arrogant, so the reader can know that Blake is using personification to broaden the meaning of the poem. By labeling the “Rose” as “modest,” Blake removes this possibility. Should the “Rose” be influenced in this way, the overall quality of it is diminished because it has become self-absorbed. A person so fair and remarkable, as an example, could become quite arrogant because of the compliments and reactions of others, and that arrogance can be a negative quality.

With this in mind, Blake could have had a meaning behind using “modest.” This meaning could be discovered when noting how much egotism all of the striking elements of a “Rose” could create. On an almost contradictory note, though, Blake refers to the “Rose” as “modest.” For a flower so praised as romantic and lovely, this adjective feels a bit unfitting. This is, without question, the most surreal of flowers regarding nearly untouchable “beauty” and refinement. Those elements, generally speaking, tend to be “love,” passion, softness, “beauty,” elegance-things that stem from 1 `extreme affection and high class. Essentially, the “Rose” is not just a flower in a garden or a decoration in a vase, but rather everything the “Rose” symbolizes. By elevating the “Rose” importance, Blake allows the reader to understand the vastness of the concept. By addressing the “Rose” as a capitalized word, Blake has treated the concept as a proper noun.